NVIC 04-94: Eliminating plan review for non-critical systems and barges

Last reviewed: October 14, 2026

This Circular is Coast Guard guidance on ending Coast Guard review of certain engineering system drawings and of structural drawings for certain cargo barges. Plans reviewed and certified by a registered PE or by ABS go directly to the OCMI for use during inspection. The vessels and systems still must comply with the regulations and will still be inspected.

Applies toThe engineering system change applies to all vessels having a Coast Guard Certificate of Inspection issued under Title 46 CFR, and the structural change applies to certain cargo barges with an ABS load line.

What it says

  1. Coast Guard plan review is no longer required for the listed Subchapter F and Subchapter J systems if a registered PE or ABS reviews and certifies them under NVIC 10-92, Change 1, and they go directly to the OCMI.

    NVIC 04-94 a“is no longer required if they are reviewed and certified by a registered PE or by ABS, in accordance with NVIC 10-92, Change 1, and submitted directly to the OCMI”
  2. The OCMI will accept these plans as meeting Coast Guard requirements without further plan review, unless questions arise during final system inspection and testing.

    NVIC 04-94 a“The OCMI will accept these plans as meeting Coast Guard requirements without further plan review unless questions arise during final system inspection and testing.”
  3. This plan submittal change applies to all vessels having a Coast Guard Certificate of Inspection issued under Title 46 CFR.

    NVIC 04-94 a“This plan submittal change is applicable to all vessels having a Coast Guard Certificate of Inspection issued under Title 46 CFR.”
  4. For seagoing cargo barges that still need Coast Guard certification and have an ABS load line, the structural plans listed in 46 CFR 91.55-5(a)(l) to (a)(12) do not have to be submitted to the Coast Guard for review and approval.

    NVIC 04-94 b“the structural plans listed in 46 CFR 91.55-5(a)(l) to (a)(12) do not have to be submitted to the Coast Guard for review and approval.”
  5. The drawings that ABS reviewed should be submitted directly to the OCMI for use during the inspection process.

    NVIC 04-94 b“drawings reviewed by ABS should be submitted directly to the OCMI for use during the inspection process.”
  6. These plans will not be subjected to the MSC oversight review described in NVIC 10-92, Change 1.

    NVIC 04-94 c“These plans will not be subjected to the MSC oversight review described in NVIC 10-92, Change 1.”
  7. Nothing in this Circular limits the OCMI's authority to require corrections or modifications if plans are found not to comply with the regulations or contain substantial errors or deficiencies.

    NVIC 04-94 c“Nothing in this Circular limits the authority of the OCMI to require corrections or modifications”

Common questions

Do I still have to send engineering system plans to the Marine Safety Center?

Not for the listed systems if a registered PE or ABS reviews and certifies them under NVIC 10-92, Change 1. The plans go directly to the OCMI for use during the inspection process.

“is no longer required if they are reviewed and certified by a registered PE or by ABS, in accordance with NVIC 10-92, Change 1, and submitted directly to the OCMI”

Does this Circular remove the regulatory requirements for these systems?

No. The changes do not eliminate or minimize the application of the regulations to the identified engineering systems or to the structural standards for cargo barges.

“do not eliminate or minimize the application of the regulations to the engineering systems identified or to the structural standards for cargo barges.”

Do unmanned seagoing cargo barges need Coast Guard certification?

Seagoing cargo barges that are unmanned and do not carry hazardous material as cargo or a flammable or combustible liquid in bulk are no longer required to be Coast Guard certificated. Barges that do not meet this criteria must still undergo Coast Guard inspection and certification.

“Seagoing cargo barges that do not meet this criteria must still undergo Coast Guard inspection and certification.”

Can the OCMI still require changes to accepted plans?

Yes. The OCMI may require corrections or modifications if the normal inspection and certification process finds plans out of compliance or with substantial errors or deficiencies.

“Nothing in this Circular limits the authority of the OCMI to require corrections or modifications”

The text of NVIC 04-94

U.S. Coast Guard, NVIC 04-94 (main body; enclosures not shown)

Elimination of Coast Guard Plan Review for Non-Critical Engineering Systems and Cargo Barges

United States Coast Guard COMDTPUB P16700.4 NVIC 4-94 JUNE 21, 1994 NAVIGATION AND VESSEL INSPECTION CIRCULAR NO. 4-94 Electronic Version for the Distribution on the World Wide Web Subj: ELIMINATION OF COAST GUARD PLAN REVIEW FOR NON-CRITICAL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS AND CARGO BARGES

Elimination of Coast Guard Plan Review for Non-Critical Engineering Systems and Cargo Barges — PURPOSE. The purpose of this Circular is to publish policy that provides for the elimination of

Coast Guard review and approval of certain engineering system drawings for all vessels as well as structural drawings for Coast Guard inspected non-self propelled cargo vessels (deck cargo and hopper barges) that have a load line issued by the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS).

Elimination of Coast Guard Plan Review for Non-Critical Engineering Systems and Cargo Barges — DIRECTIVES AFFECTED. None.

DIRECTIVES AFFECTED. None.

Elimination of Coast Guard Plan Review for Non-Critical Engineering Systems and Cargo Barges — BACKGROUND. Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Subpart 91.55, Subpart 50.20 and

Subpart 110.25 provide the cargo vessel, marine engineering and electrical engineering requirements that govern the submittal of plans affected by this Circular. The plan submittal procedures outlined in this Circular are intended to clarify and simplify the plan submittal process for certain engineering and electrical systems, and cargo barge structural plans.

Elimination of Coast Guard Plan Review for Non-Critical Engineering Systems and Cargo Barges — DISCUSSION.

a. The Coast Guard's Office of Marine Safety, Security and Environmental Protection is continuing efforts to improve efficiency of operations and service to the public and the marine industry. The publication of Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular (NVIC) No. 10-92, Change 1 in which the Marine Safety Center (MSC) can approve plans and calculations based on a satisfactory review and certification by a registered professional engineer (PE) or by ABS is a recent example. b. This Circular advances this effort by identifying vessel engineering systems that, following review by a Professional Engineer or the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), no longer need to be submitted to the Marine Safety Center. Factors considered when identifying engineering systems for which this change applies included system simplicity, the ease of compliance verification through the inspection process, and the limited design compliance value added by additional Coast Guard review or technical oversight. c. This Circular also provides for a change in the submittal of structural plans for cargo barges which have a load line assigned by ABS) and are inspected and certificated under 46 CFR Subchapter I. As the load line assigning authority, ABS ensures the major structural components and longitudinal strength are adequate for the intended service. For these barges, additional review of structural plans by the MSC or the OCMI is redundant and unnecessary. NAVIGATION AND VESSEL INSPECTION CIRCULAR NO. 4-94 d. The changes to the plan approval requirements described in this Circular do not eliminate or minimize the application of the regulations to the engineering systems identified or to the structural standards for cargo barges. Rather, the purpose is to eliminate the need for the OCMI or MSC to review drawings of these systems and reaffirms that industry bears the responsibility for regulatory compliance. The vessels and systems affected by this Circular will still be inspected by the OCMI in the course of vessel certification.

Elimination of Coast Guard Plan Review for Non-Critical Engineering Systems and Cargo Barges — IMPLEMENTATION.

a. Coast Guard plan review for the following vessel systems in Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations Subchapter F -Marine Engineering, and Subchapter J - Electrical Engineering is no longer required if they are reviewed and certified by a registered PE or by ABS, in accordance with NVIC 10-92, Change 1, and submitted directly to the OCMI for use during the inspection process. The OCMI will accept these plans as meeting Coast Guard requirements without further plan review unless questions arise during final system inspection and testing. This plan submittal change is applicable to all vessels having a Coast Guard Certificate of Inspection issued under Title 46 CFR. Subchapter F - Marine Engineering

(1) Heating Boiler Construction and Controls

(2) Ballast Piping (Except those tied into the bilge system or ballast piping on a Semi Submersible MODU)

(3) Tank Cleaning Piping

(4) Vent, Sound and Overflow Piping

(5) Sanitary Drains) Soil Drains and Overboard Piping

(6) Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Piping

(7) Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Piping

(8) Internal Combustion Engine Installations

(9) Structure of Independent Fuel Tanks not over 400 Gallons Subchapter J - Electrical Engineering

(1) Sound Powered Telephones

(2) Power Operated Boat Winch Installations

(3) Electric Power Operated Watertight Doors

(4) Fire Screen Doors Holding Systems

(5) Supervised Patrol Systems

(6) Deck Wiring Plans

(7) Motor Starter Elementary Diagrams b. Public Law 103-206 amended Section 3302 of Title 46 U.S. Code so that seagoing cargo barges which are unmanned and do not carry hazardous material as cargo or a flammable or combustible liquid in bulk are no longer required to be Coast Guard certificated. Seagoing cargo barges that do not meet this criteria must still undergo Coast Guard inspection and certification. For those seagoing cargo barges still requiring Coast Guard certification and which are issued a load line by ABS, the structural plans listed in 46 CFR 91.55-5(a)(l) to (a)(12) do not have to be submitted to the Coast Guard for review and approval. The structural review by ABS in the course of issuing a load line is sufficient to ensure the vessel meets the structural requirements of the regulations. The NAVIGATION AND VESSEL INSPECTION CIRCULAR NO. 4-94 drawings reviewed by ABS should be submitted directly to the OCMI for use during the inspection process. c. The OCMI will accept the aforementioned engineering system plans and cargo barge plans, under the conditions indicated above, as meeting Coast Guard regulations without further Coast Guard plan review. These plans will not be subjected to the MSC oversight review described in NVIC 10-92, Change 1. Nothing in this Circular limits the authority of the OCMI to require corrections or modifications if, through the normal vessel inspection and certification process, plans are found not to be in compliance with the regulations or contain substantial errors or deficiencies.

Sections it refers to

The plain-English explanation on this page was written with AI from the regulation text above and checked automatically before publishing: every quote appears in the text, every number comes from it, and a second model confirmed each statement adds nothing the text doesn't say. The regulation text governs. RegKnot is not affiliated with the U.S. Coast Guard.